The Inhumanity Clause
It is not hard to
fathom the possibility of alternate clauses appearing within historical
documents newly found under the scrutiny of Google and Wikipedia. These days
you can ask any question about anything in the comfort of your domicile and get
an answer. Often, the response will be something neither of us expected to
hear. Yes hear, each one has a distinctive voice, Alexa, Siri, Soundform,
Facebook Portal, Amazon Echo and a host of other interactive virtual assistants
can assist you in your quest for knowledge. Most of us Americans are aware the
Three Fifths Clause in the constitution, increased the representation in
government by southern states but did not offer any resolve or resolution to
the enslaved people themselves. None of these points are up for discussion they are
facts and cannot be changed. We are here to discuss the possibility of America having
an ‘Inhumanity Clause’.
It is not that farfetched
a country with no moral compass, no empathy for the citizens they deem not
worthy of participation in the freedoms or inalienable rights. No matter what
is done on the outside, they expect full participation in the great American song.
You are supposed to sing with your right hand across your heart including the
third verse, although it will never be sung out loud. Just for the record, the
third verse of the Star-Spangled Banner written by Francis Scott Key reads.
“And where is that band who so
vauntingly swore, That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion A home and a
Country should leave us no more? Their blood has wash'd out their foul
footstep's pollution. No refuge could save the
hireling and slave From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave O'er the land of the free and
the home of the brave.”
Should it not be
inhumane if the country you fought for, shed blood for, went to war for wants you to
harmonize a song about your own demise. There is so much animosity, anger and
hostility toward any non-Caucasian who questions the meaning of the words in
this verse. As if the meaning is not clear enough as expressed in the writing
and reading of the words. You are considered un-American if you do not sing “No
refuge could save the hireling and slave, From the terror of flight or the
gloom of the grave”. It just so happens each time the song is sung they
stick closely to the first verse for safety. How does it work? How am I to smile with right hand over my
heart and sing? For so many years we mimicked motions and movements as
demanded. We moved our lips even if we did not know the words. We marched to
cadences that were off beat merely because we were told to march. Not now, not
here, I refuse to blindly go in the direction unattached hands point anymore. I
will not sing a song of my demise. I am searching because there must be a
secret document, a legitimate reason none of the officers who shoot and kill
unarmed black men and women are not being held accountable. It must be
considered inhumane that any black citizen can be taken to court and charged
using video footage as evidence, but no matter how many cameras show the wrongdoing
of police the evidence must be further evaluated. It must be inhumane how week
after week unarm black men are being shot, some in their backs while walking or
running away. Most videos seen where an officer stops a black man usually ends
with a trip not to the hospital, but to the morgue. You can search the internet
and find multiple cases of white men, young and old baring weapons, not obeying
orders yelled by police officers yet if arrested will have their day in court.
Imagine with me,
what document would hold such a clause for these amounts of years and none of
us would have discovered its whereabouts? Which amendment? The second with guns
would be a good place to start. I believe America would change her laws
instantly if fifty percent of the minorities in this country began to purchase
firearms for the safety of their home or workplace. Imagine the horror if every
black person of voting age purchased a weapon, a firearm during the same week
or month. I have to believe there would be new questions added to whatever
application necessary for gun ownership. Or maybe somewhere within the
nineteenth amendment that gave the right to vote to women. You can use the
women part loosely because black women did not appear to be a part of this
great monumental occasion. I would consider it inhumane while the nation
celebrates the end of women suffrage it is not completely true it is the end.
Black women suffered another five or so generations before accomplishing the same
feat, the right to vote. Could be in 2013 as the Supreme Court rolled back
provisions of the 1965 Voting Rights Act a clause such as this could find a
home. It always seems we are the last to know when rights or privileges fought
for and won years ago are taken back. An Inhumanity Clause would find a perfect
fit in the secret retrieval of advancements or rather setbacks we are facing
under an administration (2016 - 2020) proud to place us back in our proverbial place.
Let us address a
frightening truth in the year twenty twenty. More than one hundred and ninety-eight permanent judges have been
appointed over the last three years and not one of them black. What percentage
is that? How inhumane is this? Could it be an accident? Maybe the Inhumanity
Clause is not in writing, is not printed on any document. Maybe it is in the
actions of those voted in office that do not have all of the American
people in their plans. We must consider it inhumane if laws are passed or
actions taken treating any of the minorities in this country less than. If
police are not to be held accountable for their actions when the result is
death. If states, governors, attorney generals do not speak truthfully at press
conferences when addressing the out right murder of citizens without
provocation. Maybe we do not need a clause, amendment or new laws passed that
uses the language of inclusion. Maybe if America could abide by the laws we
have presently and uphold truth and justice in the application of them. This is
the best country to live without question. It is somewhere in the word equality
we find fault in the system. We have never been an equal partner in the
freedoms every other American holds dear. Somewhere in the writing of the
foundation of American politics we were left out on purpose. We still struggle
for the proper interpretation of the phrase “all men are created free”.
Shouldn’t we be a part of the all men?
Comments
Post a Comment